tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30194186.post1492049764014859958..comments2024-02-02T10:29:34.789+00:00Comments on A Conservative's blog: How did they come up with 42 days?Benedict Whitehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01382732288664789210noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30194186.post-12940879066067611162007-12-07T22:57:00.000+00:002007-12-07T22:57:00.000+00:00Didn't you know? Jacqui Smith has a "policy hat" f...Didn't you know? Jacqui Smith has a "policy hat" from which she pulls the latest home office wheeze: http://coxsays.blogspot.com/2007/12/now-its-42-day-limit-for-they-might-be.htmlCox sayshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14730904159183434717noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30194186.post-10616627932270809392007-12-07T16:14:00.000+00:002007-12-07T16:14:00.000+00:00Ugh. If there is a teeny tiny consolation, it is ...Ugh. If there is a teeny tiny consolation, it is that at least you have a limit for how long people could be held before they have to be charged or released. We used to, before we decided that it's okay to hold people indefinitely. America is such a fine example, isn't it?<BR/><BR/>Anyway, the government should have to present sufficient evidence to charge <I>in a timely manner</I>, or release the suspect. <BR/><BR/>Hopefully your legislative branch isn't complicit in this quest to hold suspects for an unreasonable period of time.Paulhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03655496656655428284noreply@blogger.com