Thanks to Yellow Peril who pots on politicalbetting.com for a link to this article in today's Observer.
Apparently Vince Cable thinks the Goldman Sachs payouts are obscene. Well, lost of things are obscene like for example the cash for peerages affair and child pornography, but high bonuses are not on my list I am afraid.
What is even more of a concern is that Vince Cable is reported to be bleating about second home and share capital gains tax after 10 years. It drops to 10 percent. Presumably he would like to scrap that rule. However there is a reason why it is there, and that is to encourage people to hold on to investments for the long term rather than speculate in the short term. Changing the rule may well lead to a return to more short termism. It does help to think things through.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
In favour of inequality? What sort fo equality are you in favour of exactly? Equality of earnings? Opportunity? What?
Well, Mark firstly Mark, that has not happened in a while, secondly Goldman Sachs has never been a nationalised industry, and lastly what is wrong in a world where we have equal opportunities with some one making large amounts of cash?
Remind me, Mark, how long have the electorate kept the Liberals out of government?
You talk of people awarding themselves things. It does not quite work like that does it. Companies have to compete and not only that they have to do so in the face of consumer opinion.
Mark,
With respect, your argument veers between a lament at inequality and a jab at short-termism in industry.
I too blogged on this news story and my point is that these bonuses were paid by private companies to private individuals as part of a private arrangement. Whether Sachs gives a chap £10 million or simply £10 is (a) none of the government's business and (b) irrelevent to the wider public who will not get any of the £10 million even if the employee doesn't.
Government looking after its friends is a fact of life - not right, but it happens with them all and it will happen with any government of your choosing. Humans aren't whiter than white regardless of Our Dear Leader's assertions that he would be.
Don't let other people's good fortune upset you. It's only money. If you have your health and somebody to love you've got most of what you need. And I'm not being facetious - I mean it.
www.garymonro.squarespace.com
Forgive me Mark, but I thought you were concerned with equality of opportunity? You have not incedently answered the question about how long the electorate have kept the Liberals out of power.
As for you other point, government taxes people. The more you earn the more you pay. (40% of £1,000,000 is bigger than 40% of £100,000) and then does various things woth it. Picking on people with windfall taxes just means they go elsewhere, and take their money with them.
Mark,
Your comment
You say nothing that causes me to doubt that the real desire in you for the return of a Conservative government is simply that you and your cronies can use power to line your own pockets at the expense of the majority of the electorate .
is one of awesome prejudice.
Whilst I can hardly speak for Benedict I can safely say that I want a Conservative government - I want it very much - but it will make not one iota of difference to my income. I have no cronies - a few friends maybe but no cronies. I am a standard 9 to 5 wage slave who happens to believe centrist government and socialist social engineering is killing not only the country I love but also the people who live in it.
There's nothing greedy or sinister about it.
I see. The utilities did not move their power plants over seas on the morning because they were happy? Nothing to do with them being imovable then?
The Liberals have been out of power for so long because the electorate did not want them there for so long. Then look at you past scandels. (Lloyd George or Asquith anyone? Not to mention Thorpe)
I can't cast doubt on your view of the Conservative party because it is as imovable as, well a utility companies power station!
As for your comments on windfall taxes they do affect investment descisions. As I understand it investment in the North Sea is down.
Post a Comment